Hernán Bruna:

Didn't understand the idea... but it was funny xD

Tyson Ibele:

Hmm this one was ok. The acting was too minimal in my opinion, and the lack of mouths was slightly off-putting....but the poses read well.

Tim Nowak:

yea....ummm.....whats the point of the dancing? This animation shows nothing about what the main idea is. But I do like how you made the characters show action of how they speak.

Mathias Takacs:

funny

Emmanuel:

Wasn't expecting the dance at the end haha. Nice work.

Aaron Clement:

A little confusing with the dance at the end. I felt the camera moved too much... was a little distracting. Needed more weight throughout... Looked weird with no mouths to emote from.

Emmanuel Vergne:

what is he doing at the end ???

Chris Sacco:

Have the character walk up and THEN give the line. RIght now, especially without the mouth, it doesn't allow him to deliver the line with any body language. Without the sound, you wouldn't even know there was an exchange of words. The character should say the words with his movements as well.

Frank G:

The nutcake dance. Yeah! Unique.

Erik Westlund:

Dance at the end? What is that? Why does the camera bounce up and down? Playful perhaps, but why? I recommend looking at a book like "Film Directing: Shot for Shot" by Steven Katz to learn about how to stage an effective 'over-the-shoulder' conversational sequence. And you are darn close to breaking the 180 rule. I haven't said much about mechanics or acting because these other elements dominate the performance and I don't know why. Very distracting.

Taber Dunipace:

The characters are flailing around like they're having seizures, keep their motions simple and under control.

Why is he dancing at the end?

RT:

I think this is good effort but with no lips I think maybe you needed to show more expression. The end is also a little confusing for me and is hard to read what the action is intended to communicate.

HARISH:

the head action at "YES" looks a bit odd. and why does the guy dance at the end ? looks good though.

Diana Gueorguieva:

Hi!
It's smart choice to use characters with no mouth, especially if you're not good at doing lip-sync . I like what your work. the only thing I don't understand is why is he dancing at the end of the scemne?

Korvar The Fox:

The dance at the end is rather random

Sachin:

hahahaha.......i don't know wht he did in the end and why he did that but its funny......

Mat Brady:

Funny, but not complete. LURV the expression when he says yes tho. :)

sharad kumar:

ha ha ha

Matt Kenley:

ummmm wow, some animation is good or getting there. Watch those camera moves, I sometimes its better to just keep it still. And the acting choices are really weird, especially the dancing.

Virgil Tanasa:

camera is really weird... watch out for those strange movements, this is more a descriptive scene, no need to have those big shakes and tilts... a steady camera would definitely be a wiser choice.

ClintW:

what?!....

Marco Roberts:

Not sure what happened at the end?

Andrew Stovesand:

I wanna see the whole dance

Joe Jacob:

Interesting take.

Phil:

it's good but the dance at the end is a little of topick

cristis:

To bad u end it like that.

Imus zai:

lol - Excellent but the jump back needs work!

lizzie:

lip sync!?

David Andrade:

That ending has nothing to do with it.. it feels thrown in. It's cool and funny on it's own, and totally unexpecting! But it has nothing to do with his character.

Cameron Huber:

This would do even better if you used a rig with a mouth - without that it just makes it feel really odd. I don't get the ending... I mean it was funny, but made no sense :-| - everything before that works well though :)

doc:

do the funky chicken :)

Ambuj:

hahaha.

selvaraj:

good animation

Jerry Vavra:

why does he dance at the end?

Dave H Shovlin:

Panic Jig? Interesting though but I'm not sure if it works here. She looks dandy though.