Gill Frank:

good animation but bad camera. if u make a cut then dont have it on 3 frames change.

Brad Bradbury:

There isn't really any point to having camera cuts, particularly ones that are so close to the main camera.

Blaine Toderian:

The acting could be pushed a little more. It feels like his head and arms are being moved by a puppeteer; not working well together, with the dialogue. The camera move needs to be more drastic than it is; now it feels almost like a jump cut.

Abraham Aguilar:

Nice work, but you can definitely do away with the camera movememnt. Its just distracting.

ryan Sowiak:

the one thing that bothered me on this is the camera. I find that the camera moves in here are completely unnecessary and the placement of the cuts is really distracting.
I like the animation though! :)

Matt Hirengen:

jarring camera movements

Jeff Simon:

maybe try a diff cam angle

Rachel G.:

I love the inclusion of a second character, and the perspective. However, the camera movements were a bit jarring. Next time, you might try switching to a tighter shot of one of the characters before swinging back out to establish a difference in dimensions. Nice job on the animation of both characters.

Martin Silfvast:

The camera movements are very distracting.

Kensaba:

Good story. My only critique goes to camera cuts, there is not much change between them. Keep going

Corey McDaniel:

Camera movement is unnecessary & distracting.

Nice acting though.

Ashley Stringer:

well done although it would have been nice to see more dynamic poses.

well done

Andrew:

the face needs better expression in the last half from "todas!" to "idiota". remember, it's a question

Yuriko:

Nice animation, but camera moves are strange.

Mark Persson:

Good, but needs more work!

arunprasad:

good work!

Thomas Dumont:

the camera motions bring nothing here... be careful at that

Curtis:

Your cuts are popping. In other words the camera angles and general composition change, is not significant enough to make the cut work. You start off with a mid shot, and cut to another mid shot, and then back the the same mid shot. It would work much nice if you started with a long shot, cut to perhaps a close up, and finished with a mid shot.

The animation itself feels a bit draggin and slow. Off beat from the dialogue. I think zeroing in on some fundamentals will defenitely benefit your work. Great effort!

Ricky Honmong:

Nice animation but I'm thinking maybe you should have just stuck with 1 camera angle.

Johnne Tyson:

weird camera cuts that take away from your clip.

Reed:

Pretty good, for the most part. I got confused when the camera angle changed, though. If it was me, I would just do the whole animation in one shot.

Alonso Soriano:

that hand laying out is very odd at 73. these cuts are jump cuts, pretty distracting and not necessary because they don't move very much or tell us much that we don't already know. the lighting hides the faces/mouths. I know these things aren't animation related but they are hurting your animation. Takling guy is okay, but I think you were restricted by having him sitting at the table.

David Thomson:

The camera went a bit mental there, was it deliberate?

Jonay O. Urbina:

I don´t think the camera change is necessary here.

Ian Jacobson:

If you're gonna make a cut, the two shots should be more different from one another than you are doing here.

Jorge Zagatto:

Good! Specially on its ending. You've got the point in letting his mouth still opened at "idiota". It got appeal!

Vedanth Rajan:

nice try but i think there is some lighting problem between frames 199 & 216 (thats a secondary issue but it does distract from watching the animation)

Richard Clark:

the camera moves are distracting. I think a static camera would have been fine. if you wanted to change the camera angle, the change should be alot bigger.

Alex Jansen:

Your cuts dont work. The different angles aren't different enough for it to be justified. There's a 30 degree rule, where you don't want to cut from one angle to another if they are not more than 30 degrees apart. That was more like 10 degrees

Damien:

Pity about the camera move, I don't think it was necessary. Otherwise this is quite good, I like most of the poses and you got a nice mix of fast and slow, although the timing could maybe be improved.

Ryan Chan:

the camera cuts are unnecessary and you could do without

Salvador García Luque:

the camera changes are very distractive. the gestures and animation have a lack of enthusiasm

Henning Koczy:

Bad staging. Put the camera elsewhere and play to it.

Pooya Gharahgozli:

camera move is kinda wierd

Joel D:

Camera cuts are distracting

rob eddy:

good stuff, dont think you need that camera change

Andy Bewernick:

Might not switch shot's at all.